Abstract
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic psychiatric condition defined by recurrent intrusive thoughts, images, or urges (obsessions) and repetitive behaviors or mental acts (compulsions) performed to neutralize the distress those obsessions provoke. Affecting roughly 1–2% of the population, OCD is indexed by the Medical Subject Headings vocabulary under the anxiety disorders, though contemporary nosology treats it as the anchor of a distinct obsessive-compulsive and related disorders family. Its cognitive signature is not the intrusive thought itself — intrusions are near-universal — but a catastrophic misappraisal of that thought and the compulsive neutralizing it drives. This article sets out the leading cognitive-behavioral and neurobiological accounts, the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuit implicated across neuroimaging, and the two best-supported treatments: exposure and response prevention and serotonin reuptake inhibition. Three interactive demonstrations model the appraisal cycle, the exposure-habituation curve, and the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale.
Keywords: obsessions, compulsions, exposure and response prevention, cognitive appraisal, cortico-striatal circuitry
Obsessive-compulsive disorder is distinguished from ordinary carefulness by the intensity of the distress it generates and the time its rituals consume. A person with contamination obsessions does not simply dislike dirt; a contact they judge as contaminating can trigger hours of washing that they recognize as excessive yet feel unable to resist. This retained insight — the awareness that the fear is disproportionate — is characteristic, and separates OCD from delusional disorder (Abramowitz et al., 2009). The disorder was long considered rare and treatment-resistant; both assumptions proved wrong once epidemiological surveys measured its true prevalence and once behavioral and pharmacological treatments were tested in controlled trials.
What makes OCD a paradigm case for cognitive psychology is the gap between a normal mental event and a pathological response to it. Intrusive thoughts of harm, contamination, or transgression occur in the overwhelming majority of people without OCD; what differs in the disorder is the meaning assigned to the intrusion and the behavioral response that meaning compels (Rachman, 1997). The condition therefore sits at the intersection of appraisal, attention, memory confidence, and response inhibition — the cognitive faculties this article traces through its mechanisms.
Key Takeaways
- OCD is defined by obsessions (intrusive, unwanted thoughts) and compulsions (repetitive acts that neutralize the distress); the two are functionally linked in a cycle of temporary relief and negative reinforcement.
- Intrusive thoughts are near-universal; the disorder lies in their catastrophic misappraisal — an inflated sense of responsibility and an overestimation of threat — not in the thoughts themselves.
- Neuroimaging implicates a hyperactive cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loop through the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate nucleus, and both drug and behavior therapy normalize its metabolic activity.
- Exposure and response prevention (ERP) and serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the two first-line treatments with the strongest controlled evidence.
- The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is the standard instrument, scoring severity 0–40 across obsessions and compulsions independent of symptom content.
What Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Is
An obsession is a recurrent and persistent thought, image, or urge that intrudes on awareness, is experienced as unwanted and typically as senseless or repugnant, and provokes marked anxiety or distress. A compulsion is a repetitive behavior — washing, checking, ordering — or a covert mental act — counting, silent prayer, mental reviewing — that a person feels driven to perform in response to an obsession, usually according to rigid rules, and aimed at preventing or reducing distress or some dreaded outcome. The defining relationship is functional: the compulsion is performed because of the obsession and in order to discharge the distress it created.
Diagnosis requires that the obsessions or compulsions be time-consuming — a conventional threshold is more than one hour per day — or cause clinically significant distress or impairment. Most people with OCD retain at least some insight that their fears are exaggerated, a feature that distinguishes the disorder from psychosis, although insight varies and a minority hold their beliefs with near-delusional conviction (Stein et al., 2019). Symptom content clusters into recognizable dimensions — contamination and washing, harm and checking, symmetry and ordering, and taboo or forbidden thoughts — that remain relatively stable within an individual over time (Mataix-Cols et al., 2005).
Types of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
The Medical Subject Headings vocabulary indexes Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder under the broader heading Anxiety Disorders, and assigns it three narrower descriptors. These MeSH subtypes are an indexing classification — the structure by which the biomedical literature is catalogued — rather than a theory-of-the-mind taxonomy; they neither carve the disorder at natural joints nor claim to be mutually exclusive, and a given patient may meet criteria for more than one. The three narrower descriptors below are today grouped, with OCD itself, in the obsessive-compulsive and related disorders family, reflecting their shared phenomenology of repetitive, difficult-to-resist behavior.
| Subtype | In brief |
|---|---|
| Excoriation Disorder | Recurrent, compulsive skin-picking that results in lesions, accompanied by repeated attempts to stop; a body-focused repetitive behavior. |
| Hoarding Disorder | Persistent difficulty discarding possessions regardless of value, driven by a perceived need to save them and distress at parting with them, leading to accumulation that congests living space. |
| Trichotillomania | Recurrent pulling out of one's own hair producing noticeable hair loss, with repeated attempts to decrease or stop the behavior; also a body-focused repetitive behavior. |
Figure 1
The Cortico-Striato-Thalamo-Cortical Loop Implicated in OCD
The Cognitive-Behavioral Model
The dominant psychological account holds that OCD is maintained not by intrusive thoughts but by the way they are interpreted. Rachman's (1997) cognitive theory proposes that obsessions arise when a person catastrophically misinterprets the significance of an ordinary intrusive thought — reading a fleeting image of harm as evidence of a hidden violent character, for instance. Salkovskis (1985) locates the engine of the disorder in an inflated sense of responsibility: the belief that having a thought about harm confers a duty to prevent it, and that failing to act is morally equivalent to causing the harm. Under this appraisal, a neutralizing compulsion becomes not merely a relief-seeking habit but an obligation.
The behavioral half of the model explains why the cycle persists. Performing a compulsion reliably reduces distress in the short term, which negatively reinforces the compulsion and makes it more likely to recur. Crucially, the ritual also prevents the person from ever learning that the feared outcome would not have occurred anyway — the anxiety would have subsided on its own, and the catastrophe would not have followed. Avoidance and neutralizing thus protect the belief from disconfirmation, and the disorder becomes self-sealing.
The cognitive-behavioral maintenance cycle
Intrusive thoughts are near-universal. What differs in OCD is how the thought is appraised. Raise the inflated-responsibility appraisal and watch modelled distress, the urge to neutralize, and the strength of the maintaining loop rise with it.
A schematic of the Salkovskis-Rachman model: the same intrusion is benign or disabling depending on the meaning assigned to it. Performing the compulsion relieves distress briefly and negatively reinforces the loop, which is why the urge returns stronger.
Emotional Processing and Habituation
The most influential model of how exposure treatment works is Foa and Kozak's (1986) emotional processing theory. They argued that a fear is represented in memory as a network linking stimulus information, response information, and meaning; effective treatment requires activating that fear structure and then introducing information incompatible with it. Two conditions are necessary: the fear network must be engaged — the person must actually feel the anxiety — and new, disconfirming information must be available while it is active. Repeated, prolonged exposure to the feared stimulus while withholding the compulsion accomplishes both. Anxiety rises, then falls within the session as the response fails to produce catastrophe (within-session habituation), and the peak and duration of anxiety decline across sessions (between-session habituation).
More recent inhibitory-learning accounts qualify this picture (Craske et al., 2014): habituation within a session may matter less than the formation of a new, competing safety association that inhibits the original fear memory without erasing it. Either way, the therapeutic move is the same — engage the fear and block the ritual — and the demonstration below lets a reader watch the anxiety curve under repeated exposure with and without response prevention.
Exposure and response prevention
Each point is the peak anxiety (0–100) reached on one exposure trial. When the compulsion is withheld, that peak falls across trials as the feared outcome fails to occur. When the ritual is performed, anxiety drops fast within the trial but its peak never declines — the fear is protected from disconfirmation.
A schematic of the between-session habituation and inhibitory-learning accounts of ERP. Real anxiety curves are noisier and individual, but the divergence between a prevented and a completed ritual is the therapeutic point.
Neurobiology
Functional neuroimaging has converged on a cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit as the neural substrate of OCD. Positron-emission tomography shows elevated resting metabolism in the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate nucleus, and — the finding that made the circuit famous — that metabolism falls toward normal in patients who respond to either fluoxetine or behavior therapy, with the two treatments producing strikingly similar changes (Baxter et al., 1992). Graybiel and Rauch (2000) framed the disorder as a dysfunction of the basal ganglia's role in selecting and gating action, in which the loop fails to terminate a behavioral routine once it has run.
Contemporary work reframes the circuit in terms of computational functions rather than raw metabolism. Robbins and colleagues (2019) marshal evidence that OCD involves an imbalance between goal-directed and habitual control, with excessive reliance on inflexible, model-free habits, alongside deficits in reversal learning and cognitive flexibility. Gillan and colleagues (2016) showed experimentally that patients over-rely on habitual responses even when those responses are no longer instrumentally useful — a laboratory analogue of a compulsion that continues after its purpose has lapsed.
Scoring the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
Rate each of ten items from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). The same five dimensions are rated for obsessions and for compulsions, so the total is independent of whether the symptoms concern contamination, harm, or symmetry. The total maps to a conventional severity band.
The scoring reproduces Goodman and colleagues’ (1989) instrument. A commonly used response threshold is a reduction of 35% or more in the total after treatment. This tool is educational and is not a diagnostic instrument.
Measurement and Assessment
The standard severity instrument is the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), a clinician-administered interview that rates ten items — five for obsessions and five for compulsions — each on a 0–4 scale of severity, yielding a total from 0 to 40 (Goodman et al., 1989). Its design embodies an important principle: the score is independent of symptom content. The same five dimensions — time occupied, interference, distress, resistance, and control — are rated whether the obsessions concern contamination, harm, or symmetry, so a washer and a checker with equal impairment receive comparable scores. This content-independence is what allows the scale to serve as the primary outcome measure across the heterogeneous clinical trials that established the disorder's treatments. The demonstration above reproduces the scoring, and the Worked Example computes a case total.
Table 1
Table 1
First-Line and Adjunctive Treatments for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
| Treatment | Mechanism | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Exposure and response prevention (ERP) | Repeated exposure to feared stimuli while withholding compulsions; fear extinction and inhibitory learning | First-line psychotherapy; large effect sizes in controlled trials |
| Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) | Increased synaptic serotonin; normalizes CSTC circuit metabolism | First-line pharmacotherapy; effective at higher doses than for depression |
| Clomipramine | Serotonergic tricyclic; the first drug shown effective in OCD | Efficacious; reserved for SSRI non-response owing to side effects |
| Antipsychotic augmentation | Dopaminergic modulation added to an SSRI | Adjunctive for treatment-resistant cases |
| Deep brain stimulation / neurosurgery | Direct modulation of the CSTC circuit | Reserved for severe, refractory OCD |
Note. A network meta-analysis found both psychological and pharmacological interventions superior to control, with combined treatment often recommended for severe presentations (Skapinakis et al., 2016).
Worked Example
Consider a patient assessed on the Y-BOCS. The clinician rates the five obsession items — time, interference, distress, resistance, and control — and the five parallel compulsion items, each from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme).
Suppose the obsession items are rated 3, 3, 2, 2, and 3, and the compulsion items 3, 2, 3, 2, and 2. The obsession subtotal is:
3 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 3 = 13
The compulsion subtotal is:
3 + 2 + 3 + 2 + 2 = 12
The Y-BOCS total is the sum of the two subscales:
13 + 12 = 25
A total of 25 falls in the conventional severe band (24–31), above moderate (16–23) and below extreme (32–40). Because the subscales are separated, the clinician can also see that obsessions (13) are marginally more severe than compulsions (12) — clinically useful when a patient's rituals are largely mental and easy to under-report. Re-rating the same ten items after a course of ERP is how treatment response is quantified; a commonly used threshold for a meaningful response is a 35% or greater reduction in the total, which for this patient would mean a post-treatment score at or below 16.
Discussion
The convergence of the cognitive-behavioral and neurobiological accounts is the intellectually satisfying feature of OCD research. The behavioral prescription — engage the fear, block the ritual — and the pharmacological one — potentiate serotonergic transmission — arrive at the same neural endpoint, a quieter CSTC loop (Baxter et al., 1992). This does not make the two accounts identical, but it does mean that a psychological intervention and a molecular one are demonstrably acting on a shared substrate, which is rarer in psychiatry than one might hope.
The disorder also illustrates a general lesson about the relationship between normal and pathological cognition. Intrusive thoughts are not the pathology; the appraisal is. This reframing, due chiefly to Rachman and Salkovskis, moved treatment away from trying to suppress unwanted thoughts — which paradoxically increases their frequency — and toward changing the meaning assigned to them and dropping the neutralizing response. The clinical payoff was substantial, and the theoretical payoff was a model in which a universal cognitive event becomes disabling only through a specific, modifiable interpretive step.
Cognitive Implications
OCD earns its place in cognitive psychology because its symptoms are, at root, failures of ordinary cognitive control operating on ordinary cognitive contents. The intrusive thought is a normal product of a mind that generates spontaneous associations; the disorder emerges when metacognitive appraisal misreads that product as significant and when response inhibition cannot suppress the resulting urge. Experimental work locates measurable deficits in exactly these faculties: reduced cognitive flexibility and impaired reversal learning, an over-reliance on habitual over goal-directed control, and — in some studies — reduced confidence in memory and perception that drives repeated checking (Robbins et al., 2019; Gillan et al., 2016).
The checking subtype is especially instructive for cognitive theory. Repeated checking does not restore memory confidence; it erodes it, because each check makes the memory of checking more familiar and less vivid, lowering confidence and provoking a further check. The compulsion is therefore not merely futile but actively counterproductive at the level of the cognitive system it is meant to reassure — a clean demonstration that a behavior aimed at reducing uncertainty can manufacture it instead.
Current Directions
Two lines of contemporary work are reshaping the field. The first is the computational psychiatry program that recasts compulsions as a shift in the balance between goal-directed and habitual control. By showing that patients continue habitual responses after those responses cease to be useful, this work supplies a mechanistic, testable account of what a compulsion is at the level of learning theory, rather than treating it as an unexplained symptom (Gillan et al., 2016). The second is the effort to integrate the circuit-level, cognitive, and clinical descriptions into a single framework, and to use it to target treatment — from optimizing exposure through inhibitory-learning principles to refining the neural targets of deep brain stimulation in refractory cases (Robbins et al., 2019; Stein et al., 2019). The reclassification of OCD out of the anxiety disorders and into a dedicated obsessive-compulsive and related disorders family reflects this maturing, mechanism-first view of the condition.
Common Misconceptions
- OCD just means being tidy or a perfectionist.
- Diagnosis requires clinically significant distress or impairment, typically obsessions and compulsions occupying more than an hour a day; a preference for order is not the disorder (Stein et al., 2019). The colloquial use of OCD to mean fastidiousness obscures a condition whose sufferers usually find their rituals distressing and unwanted, not satisfying.
- Having disturbing intrusive thoughts means something is fundamentally wrong with a person.
- Unwanted intrusive thoughts of harm, contamination, or transgression occur in the large majority of people without OCD; what differs in the disorder is the catastrophic interpretation of the thought, not its occurrence (Rachman, 1997). The belief that a thought reveals hidden intent is itself part of the maintaining mechanism.
- OCD is untreatable or requires lifelong medication.
- Exposure and response prevention produces large, durable improvements, and a network meta-analysis confirms both psychological and pharmacological treatments outperform control (Skapinakis et al., 2016). Many patients achieve substantial and lasting symptom reduction; the older reputation for intractability predates the controlled evaluation of these treatments.
Glossary
- Basal ganglia.
- Subcortical nuclei, including the caudate, that gate the selection and termination of action and are implicated in the neural circuit of OCD.
- Cognitive flexibility.
- The capacity to adjust behavior to changing rules or contingencies; reduced in OCD and measurable through reversal-learning tasks.
- Compulsion.
- A repetitive behavior or covert mental act a person feels driven to perform in response to an obsession, aimed at reducing distress or preventing a feared outcome.
- Cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loop.
- The circuit linking orbitofrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, and thalamus whose hyperactivity is associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms and normalizes with successful treatment.
- Emotional processing theory.
- Foa and Kozak's account holding that a fear structure must be activated and met with disconfirming information for exposure treatment to work.
- Exposure and response prevention.
- The first-line behavioral treatment: prolonged, repeated contact with feared stimuli while the person refrains from performing the compulsion.
- Habituation.
- The decline of a response to a repeated stimulus; within- and between-session habituation of anxiety is one proposed mechanism of exposure therapy.
- Inflated responsibility.
- Salkovskis's construct: the belief that having a thought about harm confers a duty to prevent it, so that not neutralizing is felt as culpable.
- Inhibitory learning.
- The account of exposure therapy on which its benefit comes not from erasing the original fear memory but from forming a new, competing safety association that inhibits it.
- Insight.
- The degree to which a person recognizes their obsessive fears as exaggerated or senseless; usually retained in OCD, distinguishing it from delusional disorder.
- Intrusive thought.
- An unwanted thought, image, or urge that enters awareness unbidden; near-universal in the general population and pathological in OCD only through its misappraisal.
- Neutralizing.
- Any overt or covert act performed to cancel an intrusive thought or the distress it causes; the broad category of which compulsions are the most visible instance.
- Obsession.
- A recurrent, persistent, unwanted thought, image, or urge that intrudes on awareness and provokes marked anxiety or distress.
- Reversal learning.
- Relearning which of two options is now rewarded after the contingencies switch; impaired performance indexes the cognitive inflexibility seen in OCD.
- Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale.
- The standard clinician-rated instrument scoring OCD severity 0–40 across five obsession and five compulsion items, independent of symptom content.
Key Researchers
Edna B. Foa
(1937–2026). Was Professor of Clinical Psychology in Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania; with Michael Kozak she developed emotional processing theory and refined exposure and response prevention as the leading behavioral treatment for OCD. Wikipedia - Google Scholar
Wayne K. Goodman
(living). Professor and Chair of Psychiatry at Baylor College of Medicine; lead developer of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the field's standard severity measure. Wikipedia
David Mataix-Cols
(living). Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Science at Karolinska Institutet; developed the multidimensional model of OCD symptom structure. ORCID - Faculty Page
Stanley Rachman
(1934–2021). Was Professor of Psychology at the University of British Columbia; formulated the cognitive theory of obsessions centered on the misinterpretation of intrusive thoughts. Wikipedia - Google Scholar
Trevor W. Robbins
(b. 1949). Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Cambridge; established the role of goal-directed versus habitual control and cortico-striatal circuitry in compulsivity. ORCID - Faculty Page
Paul M. Salkovskis
(living). Professor of Experimental Psychology and Applied Science at the University of Oxford; developed the cognitive model of OCD built on inflated responsibility appraisals. ORCID - Wikipedia
Dan J. Stein
(1962–2025). Was Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Cape Town; led international efforts to characterize OCD and the obsessive-compulsive and related disorders family. Google Scholar
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between an obsession and a compulsion?
An obsession is an unwanted, intrusive thought, image, or urge that causes distress, whereas a compulsion is a repetitive behavior or mental act performed to reduce that distress or prevent a feared outcome (Stein et al., 2019). The two are functionally linked: the compulsion is the response to the obsession.
Are intrusive thoughts a sign of OCD?
Unwanted intrusive thoughts occur in the large majority of people without OCD; the disorder is marked by the catastrophic misappraisal of such thoughts and the compulsions that follow, not by the thoughts themselves (Rachman, 1997). Their mere presence is not diagnostic.
What causes OCD in the brain?
Neuroimaging implicates a hyperactive cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical loop through the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate nucleus, whose elevated metabolism decreases when patients respond to treatment (Baxter et al., 1992). No single cause is established; genetic, neural, and cognitive factors all contribute.
How is the severity of OCD measured?
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale rates ten items across obsessions and compulsions on a 0 to 4 scale for a total of 0 to 40, independent of the content of the symptoms (Goodman et al., 1989). It is the standard outcome measure in clinical trials.
What is the most effective psychological treatment for OCD?
Exposure and response prevention, in which a person confronts feared stimuli while refraining from compulsions, has the strongest controlled evidence among psychotherapies (Skapinakis et al., 2016). It is considered a first-line treatment.
Do medications help OCD?
Serotonin reuptake inhibitors are an established first-line pharmacotherapy and, like behavior therapy, normalize activity in the implicated brain circuit (Baxter et al., 1992). They are often effective at higher doses than those used for depression.
Why do compulsions make OCD worse over time?
Each compulsion reduces distress in the short term, which negatively reinforces the behavior, and it prevents the person from learning that the feared outcome would not occur, protecting the belief from disconfirmation (Salkovskis, 1985). The relief is temporary and the cycle self-reinforcing.
Is OCD classified as an anxiety disorder?
The Medical Subject Headings vocabulary indexes OCD under the anxiety disorders, but contemporary diagnostic systems place it in a distinct obsessive-compulsive and related disorders family reflecting its shared features with conditions such as hoarding and trichotillomania (Stein et al., 2019).
Support Organizations
Organizations that provide information, treatment referral, and advocacy for obsessive-compulsive disorder and related conditions.
International OCD Foundation — research funding, a treatment-provider directory, and education for patients and clinicians. (United States)
OCD-UK — a national charity offering information and advocacy for people affected by OCD. (United Kingdom)
National Institute of Mental Health — authoritative public-health information on symptoms, causes, and treatment. (United States)
References
Abramowitz, J. S., Taylor, S., & McKay, D. (2009). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. The Lancet, 374(9688), 491-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60240-3
Baxter, L. R., Schwartz, J. M., Bergman, K. S., Szuba, M. P., Guze, B. H., Mazziotta, J. C., Alazraki, A., Selin, C. E., Ferng, H. K., Munford, P., & Phelps, M. E. (1992). Caudate glucose metabolic rate changes with both drug and behavior therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49(9), 681-689. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820090009002
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 58, 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006
Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.20
Gillan, C. M., Robbins, T. W., Sahakian, B. J., van den Heuvel, O. A., & van Wingen, G. (2016). The role of habit in compulsivity. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(5), 828-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.12.033
Goodman, W. K., Price, L. H., Rasmussen, S. A., Mazure, C., Fleischmann, R. L., Hill, C. L., Heninger, G. R., & Charney, D. S. (1989). The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of General Psychiatry, 46(11), 1006-1011. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007
Graybiel, A. M., & Rauch, S. L. (2000). Toward a neurobiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuron, 28(2), 343-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00113-6
Mataix-Cols, D., Rosario-Campos, M. C., & Leckman, J. F. (2005). A multidimensional model of obsessive-compulsive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.228
Rachman, S. (1997). A cognitive theory of obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(9), 793-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)00040-5
Robbins, T. W., Vaghi, M. M., & Banca, P. (2019). Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Puzzles and prospects. Neuron, 102(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.046
Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(5), 571-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(85)90105-6
Skapinakis, P., Caldwell, D. M., Hollingworth, W., Bryden, P., Fineberg, N. A., Salkovskis, P., Welton, N. J., Baxter, H., Kessler, D., Churchill, R., & Lewis, G. (2016). Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions for management of obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 730-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30069-4
Stein, D. J., Costa, D. L. C., Lochner, C., Miguel, E. C., Reddy, Y. C. J., Shavitt, R. G., van den Heuvel, O. A., & Simpson, H. B. (2019). Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 5(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0102-3