Orgasm

Abstract

Orgasm is the climax of the human sexual response, a form of sexual behavior that cognitive psychology treats less as a spinal reflex than as the product of attention, appraisal, and prediction. Whether climax arrives depends first on whether attention stays on mounting bodily sensation rather than drifting into self-monitoring, so that distraction and performance worry can hold arousal below threshold even when physical stimulation is intense. It depends next on a balance between facilitating excitation and interfering inhibition, with climax behaving as an all-or-none tipping point reached only when excitation clears a threshold and a positive-feedback loop engages. And it depends on perception: the felt intensity of climax is constructed from bodily signals rather than read straight off them, so genital and subjective arousal can diverge. Three demonstrations trace the attentional gate, the excitation–inhibition balance, and arousal concordance.

Keywords: orgasm, sexual response, attention, cognitive interference, concordance

Orgasm looks, from the outside, like the most purely physical of events — a reflex at the end of a buildup, as automatic as a sneeze. The experimental record says otherwise. The same intense stimulation produces climax on one occasion and nothing on another, and the difference lies not in the body but in the mind: where attention is pointed, what the moment is appraised to mean, and whether worry has crept in to interrupt the buildup. That sensitivity to cognition is why orgasm repays a cognitive reading. It is not a switch thrown by sensation alone but the end of a chain of mental operations — attending to sensation, appraising it as safe and arousing rather than threatening, and letting a positive-feedback loop run to completion without the interruption that self-focus and anxiety supply (Mah & Binik, 2001; Barlow, 1986).

Framing climax this way places it inside the general science of attention, appraisal, and decision-making rather than sealing it off as pure physiology. The decision to pursue sex at all is itself a cognitive act with hundreds of distinct motives (Meston & Buss, 2007), and the influence runs both ways: appraisals and attention shape whether orgasm occurs, and the experience of orgasm — or its reliable absence — feeds back into what a person expects, pursues, and prioritizes next time (Toates, 2009).

What Orgasm Is

Orgasm, in the sense indexed by MeSH and used across the sexological literature, is the climax of sexual excitement — a brief, intensely pleasurable peak marked by rhythmic muscular contractions and an abrupt release of sexual tension — and it is classified as a specific form of sexual behavior, the parent descriptor under which the taxonomy files it. It is the third phase in the classic four-stage model of the sexual response cycle, following excitement and plateau and preceding resolution. That physiological description is accurate but incomplete, because the same bodily machinery can be primed and yet produce no climax, or produce one experienced as faint, depending entirely on what the mind is doing (Mah & Binik, 2001; Georgiadis & Kringelbach, 2012).

Two features make orgasm a revealing case for cognitive psychology. The first is that it is attention-dependent. Sexual arousal builds only while attention is allocated to erotic sensation and cues; divert that attention — into monitoring one's own performance, into intrusive worry, into any competing demand — and the buildup stalls, no matter how much physical stimulation continues (Dekker & Everaerd, 1988; Barlow, 1986). The second is that orgasm is constructed, not merely registered. Brain-imaging work shows climax as a distributed event spanning sensory, reward, and attentional systems rather than a single genital readout, which is why its felt intensity and even its occurrence depend on central interpretation and not on peripheral events alone (Komisaruk & Whipple, 2005; Wise et al., 2017).

A third feature connects orgasm to perception and to the mismatch between the body and the mind's report of it. Genital arousal and the conscious experience of being aroused do not always move together; the degree to which they do — their concordance — varies across people and situations, so the subjective experience that culminates in orgasm is partly a perceptual inference about one's own bodily state rather than a transparent reading of it (Chivers, 2017).

How Orgasm Intersects Cognition

Orgasm touches cognitive psychology at three points, each a different part of the same event. First, attention: climax requires that attention stay on accumulating erotic sensation, so distraction and self-focused monitoring act as a gate that can hold arousal below threshold. Second, appraisal: facilitating interpretations raise excitation while automatic negative thoughts and performance anxiety raise inhibition, and climax is the all-or-none result of that balance tipping one way. Third, perception: the felt experience of orgasm is constructed from bodily and brain signals, so genital and subjective arousal can concord tightly or diverge. Table 1 lays out the three, and the three interactive demonstrations below take them in turn.

Table 1

Three Cognitive Problems Behind Orgasm

Note. The three problems are facets of one event, not stages in a fixed sequence; a person attends, appraises, and perceives continuously and in parallel. MeSH files Orgasm (D009948) under Sexual Behavior (F01.145.802.658) and records no narrower descriptors beneath it, so the organizing structure here is cognitive rather than taxonomic.

Attention: climax as a gated accumulation

The first cognitive problem is what lets mounting erotic sensation accumulate toward climax in the first place. The answer is attention. Sexual arousal is not a passive readout of stimulation; it builds only while attention is allocated to erotic sensation and cues, and it stalls the moment attention is diverted (Dekker & Everaerd, 1988). The clinical form of that diversion is spectatoring — stepping back to monitor one's own performance as if from outside — which Barlow's model of sexual dysfunction identifies as the central mechanism by which anxiety blocks response. The anxious person attends to threat and to self-evaluation rather than to erotic cues, and this misallocation of attention, not the anxiety itself, is what interrupts the buildup (Barlow, 1986).

The attentional account makes a sharp, testable prediction: anything that pulls attention off erotic sensation should impair arousal, and anything that restores it should help. Both halves hold. Experimentally loading attention with a competing task reduces genital arousal, and attention to sexual stimuli — indexed directly by where the eyes go — tracks the arousal those stimuli produce (Dekker & Everaerd, 1988; Rupp & Wallen, 2007). Sexual fantasy works as deliberately deployed internal attention, sustaining arousal by keeping the mind on erotic content (Leitenberg & Henning, 1995). And the therapeutic payoff is real: mindfulness-based treatment, which trains attention onto present bodily sensation and away from judgment and distraction, reliably improves sexual response — the clearest applied demonstration that orgasm is gated by where attention is pointed (Brotto & Basson, 2014). Demo 1 makes the gate concrete: sliders set stimulation intensity and attentional focus, and an arousal curve either climbs past the climax threshold or plateaus below it when attention is withdrawn.

Appraisal: climax as an excitation–inhibition tipping point

The second problem is why climax is abrupt — an all-or-none peak rather than a smooth ascent — and why intense arousal can still fail to reach it. The cognitive answer is that orgasm sits at the top of a balance between facilitating excitation and interfering inhibition, both of which are set largely by appraisal. This dual-control framing — that sexual response reflects separable excitatory and inhibitory systems rather than a single drive — is the organizing model behind the modern cognitive account, distinguishing people who reach climax readily from those in whom inhibition dominates even under strong stimulation (Bancroft & Janssen, 2000). Positive, absorbed interpretations of the situation raise excitation; worry, self-criticism, and the intrusive automatic negative thoughts catalogued in studies of sexual response raise inhibition. The relationship between these thoughts and arousal is direct: the more a person's cognition during sex is occupied by failure-anticipating or self-monitoring thoughts, the lower the arousal that results (Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2008).

Why a tipping point rather than a smooth function? Because the final ascent to orgasm appears to be driven by positive feedback: as arousal rises past a critical level, sensory and autonomic signals begin to amplify one another in a self-reinforcing loop, which Safron models as rhythmic entrainment carrying the system rapidly to climax once it is engaged (Safron, 2016). Below the threshold, inhibition can hold the balance indefinitely — the familiar experience of high arousal that simply will not resolve — while above it, the loop runs almost unstoppably to completion. This two-sided structure, a buildup that is gradual and a climax that is sudden, is exactly what a threshold-plus-positive-feedback system produces, and it reconciles the subjective report of orgasm as a discrete event with the continuous physiology beneath it (Mah & Binik, 2001). Demo 2 shows the balance directly: raising inhibition with worry holds the net drive below the tipping point even at high excitation, while clearing it lets the positive-feedback loop engage.

Perception: climax as a constructed experience

The third problem runs from body to mind: how the felt experience of arousal and orgasm relates to the bodily events beneath it. The naive view is that subjective arousal simply reports genital arousal. It does not, reliably. The concordance between genital response and subjective experience — how tightly the two track each other — is itself a variable, substantial in some people and situations and strikingly loose in others, which means the conscious experience leading to orgasm is partly a perceptual inference about one's own body rather than a transparent readout of it (Chivers, 2017). When concordance is low, a person may show clear genital arousal while feeling little, or feel highly aroused on modest genital evidence; the felt state is constructed, weighting bodily signals by attention and appraisal rather than copying them.

That orgasm is centrally constructed is confirmed from the brain side. Functional imaging shows climax as a distributed event engaging sensory, reward, emotional, and attentional regions together, not a simple genital-to-cortex relay (Komisaruk & Whipple, 2005), and the pattern of activity unique to orgasm spans widespread networks rather than a single center (Wise et al., 2017) — consistent with the broader claim that sexual climax draws on the same central pleasure machinery as other intense rewards (Georgiadis & Kringelbach, 2012). The practical face of this construction is the orgasm gap: large and patterned differences in how reliably people reach orgasm across partnered contexts, which track attention, expectation, technique, and prioritization — cognitive and situational variables — rather than anatomy alone (Frederick et al., 2018; Herbenick et al., 2018). Demo 3 treats the body–mind link as the variable it is: a concordance control sets how tightly felt arousal tracks genital arousal across a set of occasions, and the resulting divergence is shown directly.

Worked Example

Model the attentional gate to see why distraction can block climax even under intense stimulation. Represent two inputs on a 0–100 scale: the intensity of erotic stimulation S and the proportion of attention held on bodily sensation F (so that F = 100 is full absorption and lower values represent distraction or spectatoring). Let the arousal the system can sustain — its plateau P — be the product of the two, because stimulation only counts to the extent it is attended:

P = S × F / 100.

Arousal approaches that plateau over time, A(t) = P(1 − e^−t/τ) with a time constant τ = 12 s, and climax occurs if and only if the plateau reaches the threshold θ = 65. Take an absorbed encounter with strong stimulation and attention almost fully on sensation: S = 85, F = 90. Then

P = 85 × 90 / 100 = 76.5,

which clears the threshold of 65, so climax is reached; the time to cross it is −τ ln(1 − 65/76.5) ≈ 22.7 s. Now hold the stimulation fixed and let attention divide — the onset of spectatoring or intrusive thought — dropping F to 55:

P = 85 × 55 / 100 = 46.75,

which falls short of 65. Arousal now rises, plateaus at 46.75, and stays there: no amount of additional time carries it to climax, because the ceiling itself is below threshold. The tipping point in attention is at F = 65 / 85 × 100 ≈ 76.5: above it climax is reachable, below it the same body under the same stimulation cannot get there. This is the attentional account rendered arithmetic — climax is gated by where attention is pointed, not by stimulation alone (Barlow, 1986; Dekker & Everaerd, 1988). Demo 1 runs exactly this computation, letting both inputs vary so the threshold crossing can be watched directly.

Discussion

Reading orgasm as a cognitive event does two useful things. It dissolves the puzzle of the primed body that produces no climax: if arousal is gated by attention and capped by an excitation–inhibition balance, then intense stimulation accompanied by self-monitoring or worry is expected to stall, exactly as the clinical and experimental record shows, rather than being a paradox (Barlow, 1986; Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2008). And it locates orgasm within the general science of attention, appraisal, and emotion rather than treating it as isolated physiology: the same attentional capture by threat that impairs performance in other domains, and the same constructive perception that builds other feelings from bodily signals, are what govern climax (Mah & Binik, 2001; Chivers, 2017). The practical implication follows directly. Because the gate is attentional, interventions that retrain attention onto present sensation — rather than exhortations to try harder, which only deepen self-monitoring — should help, and the mindfulness evidence confirms it (Brotto & Basson, 2014).

Two cautions keep the account honest. First, the cognitive framing complements physiology, it does not replace it; hormones, medication, vascular and neurological factors all set the parameters within which attention and appraisal operate, and a cognitive gate cannot open on a body that cannot respond. Second, much of the evidence on concordance and on the orgasm gap is strongest in specific populations and partnered contexts, and generalizing it demands care (Chivers, 2017; Frederick et al., 2018). The mechanisms are well-supported; the full mapping from cognition to climax across people and situations is still being drawn (Georgiadis & Kringelbach, 2012).

Current Directions

The most active front is the computational modeling of climax itself. Safron's account of orgasm as rhythmic entrainment — a self-reinforcing synchronization of sensory and autonomic rhythms that carries the system past a tipping point — reframes the abruptness of orgasm as the signature of a dynamical threshold rather than a mystery, and invites formal models that predict when the loop will and will not engage (Safron, 2016). A second front uses high-resolution imaging to specify the distributed brain signature of orgasm and to ask what, if anything, is unique to it versus shared with other intense rewards (Wise et al., 2017; Georgiadis & Kringelbach, 2012). A third develops the attentional account into something interveneable at scale, asking whether mindfulness and attention-retraining can be targeted to the specific point in the response where self-monitoring intrudes, and whether the orgasm gap narrows when attention, expectation, and prioritization are addressed directly rather than treated as fixed (Brotto & Basson, 2014; Frederick et al., 2018). The question uniting them is whether climax is best understood and supported by changing the body's parameters or by protecting the attentional and appraisal processes that decide whether those parameters are ever allowed to matter.

Common Misconceptions

Orgasm is a purely physical reflex that follows automatically from enough stimulation.

Stimulation is necessary but not sufficient. Arousal accumulates only while attention stays on erotic sensation, so self-monitoring, distraction, or worry can hold it below the climax threshold no matter how intense the stimulation — which is why the same body climaxes on one occasion and not another (Barlow, 1986; Dekker & Everaerd, 1988).

Trying harder to climax should help when it is not happening.

It usually makes things worse. Effortful striving is itself a form of self-focused monitoring — spectatoring — that diverts attention from sensation and raises inhibition. Interventions that work do the opposite, redeploying attention onto present bodily experience and away from judgment (Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2008; Brotto & Basson, 2014).

If the body shows arousal, the person must feel aroused.

Not necessarily. Genital and subjective arousal are distinct channels whose concordance varies; a person can show clear genital response while feeling little, or the reverse, because felt arousal is constructed from bodily signals weighted by attention and appraisal rather than copied from them (Chivers, 2017).

The orgasm gap between groups is simply a matter of anatomy.

Anatomy matters, but the large, patterned differences in orgasm frequency across partnered contexts track cognitive and situational variables — attention, expectation, technique, and prioritization — more than physiology alone, and they shrink under conditions that change those variables (Frederick et al., 2018; Herbenick et al., 2018).

Glossary

Arousal.

The state of heightened sexual excitement that builds toward climax; cognitively, it accumulates only while attention is allocated to erotic sensation and stalls when attention is withdrawn (Dekker & Everaerd, 1988).

Attention.

The selective allocation of limited processing to some cues over others; it acts as the gate on sexual arousal, which builds only while attention is on erotic sensation rather than on self-monitoring (Barlow, 1986).

Automatic thoughts.

Intrusive, unbidden cognitions — often self-critical or failure-anticipating — that arise during sexual activity and raise inhibition, lowering the arousal that results (Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2008).

Cognitive interference.

The disruption of sexual response by attention-demanding worry and self-evaluation; the mechanism by which anxiety blocks arousal in Barlow's model of sexual dysfunction (Barlow, 1986).

Concordance.

The degree to which genital arousal and subjective experience track each other; a variable rather than a constant, so felt arousal is partly a perceptual inference about the body rather than a direct readout (Chivers, 2017).

Decision-making.

The process of selecting among options by weighing their values; the pursuit of sex and of orgasm is treated here as a cognitive act with many distinct motives, and climax in turn reshapes later choices (Meston & Buss, 2007).

Excitation.

The facilitating side of the balance that drives arousal upward, raised by absorbed, positive appraisal of the erotic situation; climax requires it to clear a threshold (Safron, 2016).

Genital arousal.

The peripheral, bodily component of sexual response; distinct from subjective arousal, with which it can concord tightly or diverge (Chivers, 2017).

Inhibition.

The interfering side of the balance that holds arousal down, raised by worry, self-monitoring, and automatic negative thoughts; sufficient inhibition keeps the system below the climax threshold indefinitely (Nobre & Pinto-Gouveia, 2008).

Orgasm gap.

The large, patterned differences in how reliably people reach orgasm across partnered contexts, tracking attention, expectation, and prioritization as much as anatomy (Frederick et al., 2018).

Orgasm.

The climax of sexual excitement — an intensely pleasurable peak with rhythmic contractions and release of tension; treated here as a gated, threshold event constructed from bodily and central signals (Mah & Binik, 2001).

Rhythmic entrainment.

The self-reinforcing synchronization of sensory and autonomic rhythms that, past a critical level of arousal, carries the system rapidly to climax — the positive-feedback loop behind orgasm's abruptness (Safron, 2016).

Sexual behavior.

The parent category under which MeSH files orgasm; the broad class of behavior within which climax is one peak event (Georgiadis & Kringelbach, 2012).

Sexual response cycle.

The classic four-stage sequence — excitement, plateau, orgasm, resolution — within which orgasm is the third phase; a physiological frame that cognition modulates at every step (Georgiadis & Kringelbach, 2012).

Spectatoring.

Stepping back to monitor one's own sexual performance as if from outside; a misallocation of attention from sensation to self-evaluation that interrupts the buildup to climax (Barlow, 1986).

Subjective arousal.

The consciously felt experience of being sexually aroused; constructed from bodily and central signals weighted by attention and appraisal, and not always concordant with genital arousal (Chivers, 2017).

Key Researchers

David H. Barlow

(Boston University, Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Psychiatry). Developed the model of sexual dysfunction in which anxiety impairs response by capturing attention — the cognitive-interference and spectatoring account that grounds the attentional reading of orgasm. Google Scholar · Faculty page · Wikipedia

Lori A. Brotto

(University of British Columbia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology). Developed and tested mindfulness-based treatments for sexual difficulties, providing the clearest applied evidence that redeploying attention onto present sensation improves sexual response. ORCID · Google Scholar · Faculty page · Wikipedia

Meredith L. Chivers

(Queen's University, Department of Psychology). Established how loosely genital and subjective arousal can track each other, showing that the conscious experience preceding orgasm is partly a perceptual construction rather than a direct readout of the body. ORCID · Google Scholar · Faculty page · Wikipedia

Barry R. Komisaruk

(Rutgers University–Newark, Department of Psychology). Mapped the brain during orgasm with functional neuroimaging, establishing climax as a distributed sensory, reward, and attentional event rather than a single genital readout. ORCID · Google Scholar · Faculty page · Wikipedia

Cindy M. Meston

(University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology). Mapped the many distinct reasons people have sex, framing sexual pursuit — and the pursuit of orgasm within it — as a motivational and decision problem rather than a single drive. ORCID · Google Scholar · Faculty page · Wikipedia

Beverly Whipple

(Rutgers University, Professor Emerita, College of Nursing). Co-authored the foundational functional-imaging work on orgasm, helping establish the distributed brain response that the neuroscience of climax now takes as its starting point. Wikipedia

Frequently Asked Questions

How does attention affect whether someone reaches orgasm?

Attention is the gate on sexual arousal. Arousal accumulates only while attention is allocated to erotic sensation and cues, and it stalls the moment attention is diverted into self-monitoring, intrusive worry, or any competing demand. This is why intense stimulation can fail to produce climax: if attention steps back to evaluate performance — the pattern called spectatoring — the buildup is interrupted regardless of how much physical stimulation continues. Experimental work confirms both halves: loading attention with a competing task lowers genital arousal, while interventions that retrain attention onto present sensation improve response. In cognitive terms, climax is gated by where attention is pointed, not driven by stimulation alone.

Why can high sexual arousal still fail to end in orgasm?

Because orgasm sits at the top of a balance between facilitating excitation and interfering inhibition, and climax occurs only when the net drive crosses a threshold. Worry, self-criticism, and automatic negative thoughts raise inhibition, and sufficient inhibition can hold even high arousal below the tipping point indefinitely — the familiar experience of being very aroused yet unable to finish. The final ascent appears to depend on a positive-feedback loop that engages only past a critical level of arousal; below that level the loop never starts. So failure to climax at high arousal is not paradoxical but exactly what a threshold-plus-feedback system predicts when inhibition is elevated.

What is spectatoring and how does it interfere with sexual response?

Spectatoring is the habit of stepping back during sex to monitor one's own performance as if watching from outside. In Barlow's model of sexual dysfunction it is the central mechanism by which anxiety impairs response: the anxious person attends to threat and self-evaluation rather than to erotic sensation, and this misallocation of attention — not the anxiety as a feeling — is what interrupts arousal. Because the buildup to orgasm requires attention to stay on sensation, spectatoring directly closes the attentional gate. It also explains why effortful striving backfires, since trying harder is itself a form of self-focused monitoring that pulls attention away from the very sensations climax depends on.

Why do genital arousal and felt arousal sometimes not match?

Because felt, subjective arousal is constructed from bodily signals rather than read straight off them. The concordance between genital response and subjective experience is a variable: in some people and situations the two track each other tightly, in others only loosely. When concordance is low, a person may show clear genital arousal while feeling little, or feel strongly aroused on modest genital evidence, because the conscious experience weights bodily signals by attention and appraisal. This makes the subjective state leading to orgasm partly a perceptual inference about one's own body, which is why context, expectation, and attention can change how aroused the same bodily state feels.

Is the orgasm gap caused by anatomy or by cognition?

Both matter, but the large, patterned differences in how reliably people reach orgasm across partnered contexts track cognitive and situational variables as much as anatomy. Attention, expectation, technique, and whether a given partner's orgasm is prioritized all shape outcomes, and the gap narrows under conditions that change those variables rather than changing bodies. Treating the orgasm gap as fixed anatomy misses that it is, in large part, a product of what receives attention and what is expected and pursued — which is precisely why it responds to changes in cognition and situation rather than being immutable.

How does decision-making lead to sexual behavior and orgasm?

The pursuit of sex is a cognitive act, not a single automatic drive. Research cataloguing why people have sex finds hundreds of distinct motives — from pleasure and love to stress relief, duty, and curiosity — so the decision to engage is a valuation among many goals. That decision sets the context in which arousal and climax either develop or do not, and the quality of the resulting experience then feeds back into motivation. Orgasm reliably attained strengthens the incentive value of the behavior that produced it; its reliable absence weakens that value and reshapes what a person seeks, so decision-making and climax are coupled in both directions.

Can orgasm difficulties be improved by changing attention?

The evidence says yes for a substantial class of difficulties. Mindfulness-based treatments, which train attention onto present bodily sensation and away from judgment and distraction, reliably improve sexual response — a direct applied test of the attentional account. The logic is that many orgasm difficulties are maintained by misallocated attention: self-monitoring and intrusive thought divert processing from erotic sensation and raise inhibition. Retraining attention addresses the mechanism rather than urging more effort, which would only deepen the self-focus. This does not mean every difficulty is attentional — physiological and medical factors set the parameters — but where the gate is the problem, changing attention changes the outcome.

Is orgasm a reflex or a brain event?

Orgasm is better described as a distributed brain event than a spinal reflex. Functional imaging shows climax engaging sensory, reward, emotional, and attentional regions together rather than a single genital-to-cortex relay, and the pattern of activity associated with orgasm spans widespread networks. This is consistent with orgasm drawing on the same central pleasure machinery as other intense rewards, and it explains why the felt intensity and even the occurrence of climax depend on central interpretation — attention and appraisal — and not on peripheral stimulation alone. The reflex language captures the rhythmic motor output but misses that the experience itself is centrally constructed.

References

Bancroft, J., & Janssen, E. (2000). The dual control model of male sexual response: A theoretical approach to centrally mediated erectile dysfunction. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24(5), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00024-5

Barlow, D. H. (1986). Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(2), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.2.140

Brotto, L. A., & Basson, R. (2014). Group mindfulness-based therapy significantly improves sexual desire in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 57, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.001

Chivers, M. L. (2017). The specificity of women's sexual response and its relationship with sexual orientations: A review and ten hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1161–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0897-x

Dekker, J., & Everaerd, W. (1988). Attention and sexual arousal. Psychophysiology, 25(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00957.x

Frederick, D. A., St. John, H. K., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(1), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0939-z

Georgiadis, J. R., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2012). The human sexual response cycle: Brain imaging evidence linking sex to other pleasures. Progress in Neurobiology, 98(1), 49–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.05.004

Herbenick, D., Fu, T.-C., Arter, J., Sanders, S. A., & Dodge, B. (2018). Women's experiences with genital touching, sexual pleasure, and orgasm: Results from a U.S. probability sample of women ages 18 to 94. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1346530

Komisaruk, B. R., & Whipple, B. (2005). Functional MRI of the brain during orgasm in women. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2005.10559829

Leitenberg, H., & Henning, K. (1995). Sexual fantasy. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.469

Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2001). The nature of human orgasm: A critical review of major trends. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(6), 823–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00069-6

Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(4), 477–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2

Nobre, P. J., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2008). Cognitions, emotions, and sexual response: Analysis of the relationship among automatic thoughts, emotional responses, and sexual arousal. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(4), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9258-0

Rupp, H. A., & Wallen, K. (2007). Sex differences in viewing sexual stimuli: An eye-tracking study in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51(4), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.008

Safron, A. (2016). What is orgasm? A model of sexual trance and climax via rhythmic entrainment. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 6, 31763. https://doi.org/10.3402/snp.v6.31763

Toates, F. (2009). An integrative theoretical framework for understanding sexual motivation, arousal, and behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 46(2–3), 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490902747768

Wise, N. J., Frangos, E., & Komisaruk, B. R. (2017). Brain activity unique to orgasm in women: An fMRI analysis. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(11), 1380–1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.08.014