Cigarette Smoking

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is a type of tobacco smoking: the burning of finely cut, flue-cured tobacco whose acidic smoke is drawn deep into the lungs. Because that smoke is acidic, almost none of its nicotine is absorbed in the mouth, so the smoker must inhale, and the drug reaches the brain as an arterial bolus within seconds. Under the rate hypothesis, that steep, fast arrival is the strongest reinforcer in common use, making the cigarette the most addictive of the ordinary ways of taking nicotine. A smoker also takes the drug in hundreds of small, discretely reinforced puffs a day, so the habit is overlearned as well as steeply reinforced. This article develops the cognitive account—delivery kinetics, the pH chemistry that forces inhalation, and the reinforcement schedule of the puff—through a worked example and three interactive demonstrations.

Keywords: nicotine, addiction, reward learning, pulmonary absorption, reinforcement

No product in daily life is engineered, by chemistry and by habit, to addict as efficiently as the cigarette. It carries the same drug as a cigar or a pipe, usually less of it per unit, yet it is far more addictive—and the reason is not the tobacco but the way the nicotine arrives. The cigarette smoker inhales. The acidic smoke yields almost no nicotine to the mouth, so the drug must reach the lungs, and from the lungs it is swept to the brain as a sharp arterial spike within seconds of each puff.

This article treats cigarette smoking as cognitive psychology treats any drug habit: as a learned behavior shaped by the kinetics of reward rather than by the chemistry of the drug alone. The cigarette is the instructive case at the opposite pole from the cigar—it holds the molecule constant and delivers it as fast and as often as any ordinary product can. Two features do the work: each puff is a steep, fast reinforcer, and a smoker takes hundreds of them a day. Speed sets how strongly each dose reinforces; frequency sets how deeply the behavior is overlearned.

What Cigarette Smoking Is

A cigarette is a thin roll of finely cut, cured tobacco wrapped in paper, burned at one end while its smoke is drawn through the other. In the Medical Subject Headings vocabulary, Cigarette Smoking is a narrower descriptor beneath Tobacco Smoking, and it is defined less by the tobacco than by how that tobacco is used: the smoke is drawn into the lungs rather than held in the mouth (West, 2017).

That defining habit—lung, not mouth—follows from chemistry. The flue-curing used for cigarette tobacco leaves its smoke acidic, and in acidic smoke almost all of the nicotine is ionised, the charged form that does not cross biological membranes. Ionised nicotine is barely absorbed across the lining of the mouth, so a cigarette smoker cannot take up a useful dose by holding the smoke; the drug must reach the enormous surface of the lungs (Benowitz et al., 2009). A cigar, by contrast, burns fermented tobacco whose alkaline smoke carries much of its nicotine in the un-ionised form, which is why a cigar smoker can absorb the drug across the mouth and traditionally does not inhale.

The consequence for the brain is a matter of timing. Nicotine is an agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, and its activation of dopamine neurons in the midbrain drives release in the mesolimbic reward pathway (Wittenberg et al., 2020; Dani & Balfour, 2011). The same dopamine signal underlies every tobacco habit; what sets the cigarette apart is how sharply that signal fires. Pulmonary absorption carries nicotine from the lungs through the pulmonary vein and the left heart into the arterial circulation, reaching the brain as a bolus within about ten to twenty seconds of a puff—faster even than an intravenous injection, which must first mix through the venous side (Benowitz, 2010). The dose per puff is small; the leading edge is extraordinarily steep.

The cigarette can be set beside the slower forms of smoking on every feature the cognitive account turns on (Table 1). Reading across a row makes the central point concrete: the cigarette and the cigar share a drug and differ on almost everything that governs how it is taken up and how strongly it reinforces.

Table 1

The Cigarette and the Cigar Compared on the Features That Set Addictiveness and Harm

Note. The acidic/alkaline contrast and its absorption consequences follow Benowitz et al. (2009); the reinforcement contrast follows the rate hypothesis (Russell, 1990; Benowitz, 2010); the disease-site contrast follows Henley et al. (2004) and Wald & Watt (1997).

Cigarette Smoking and Cognition

Cognitive psychology studies cigarette smoking through the same systems that carry any nicotine habit—reward learning, attention, and choice—but the cigarette earns its own treatment because it sits at the extreme of each. It is the natural upper bound for the cigar: hold the drug fixed, deliver it as fast and as often as possible, and watch the addiction become as strong as an ordinary product can make it. Three ideas organise the account: that the rate of delivery sets how strongly each dose reinforces, that the pH of the smoke forces the fast pulmonary route, and that the frequency of the puff overlearns the behavior.

The rate hypothesis at the fast end

The central cognitive-pharmacological idea in all of tobacco smoking is the rate hypothesis: the reinforcing power of a dose of nicotine depends on how quickly it reaches the brain, not merely on how much arrives. A sharp spike produces a tight, salient pairing between the act and the dopaminergic reward signal; a slow rise smears that signal across minutes and weakens the association (Russell, 1990; Benowitz et al., 2009). The cigarette is the hypothesis's upper limit. Inhaled, it delivers nicotine on a time-course measured in seconds rather than minutes, and it is correspondingly the most addictive of the ordinary ways of taking the drug even though it carries less nicotine than a large cigar (Benowitz, 2010).

This reframes the common intuition that addictiveness must follow the amount consumed. A cigarette contains only a modest dose, yet it hooks harder than a cigar many times its size, because the brain's reward system reads the slope of the rise, not the total eventually absorbed. Demo 1 lets the delivery route be switched between an inhaled cigarette and a non-inhaled form and reads off the initial rate of rise that the rate hypothesis says matters.

Acidity and the obligatory pulmonary route

Why must cigarette smoke be inhaled, when cigar smoke need not be? The answer is acid-base chemistry, and it is worth making explicit because it is the hinge on which the whole cognitive story turns. Nicotine is a weak base; in smoke it exists in equilibrium between an ionised form, which does not cross membranes, and an un-ionised form, which does. The fraction that is un-ionised rises with the pH of the smoke. Cigarette tobacco is flue-cured, and its smoke is acidic—pH low enough that almost all of the nicotine is ionised and essentially none is available for absorption across the oral mucosa (Benowitz et al., 2009).

So the route of delivery, and therefore the addictiveness, is downstream of a single chemical variable. Make the smoke acidic and the smoker must draw it into the lungs to absorb the drug at all; make it alkaline and the drug can be taken up in the mouth without inhaling. The acidity of cigarette smoke is not incidental—it is what commits the smoker to the fast pulmonary route and so to the steepest reinforcement. Demo 2 makes this quantitative, plotting the un-ionised fraction against smoke pH so the chemistry behind the cigarette's obligatory inhalation is visible on a curve.

The puff as a reinforcer: schedule and overlearning

Steep delivery explains why each dose reinforces strongly, but the cigarette's grip owes as much to how often the dose is taken. A cigarette is not smoked in one draw; it is smoked in roughly ten puffs, and each puff is its own fast arterial spike paired with the same hand-to-mouth movement, taste, and setting. A pack-a-day smoker therefore takes on the order of two hundred discretely reinforced nicotine doses every day, tens of thousands a year, and hundreds of thousands over a smoking career (Benowitz, 2010; Russell, 1990).

That schedule is what makes the behavior not merely reinforced but overlearned. Each puff tightens the association between a cue, an action, and a reward, and a behavior rehearsed on that scale becomes automatic—triggered by cues with little deliberation, which is part of why cigarette smoking is so resistant to the smoker's own intention to stop (Rose, 2006). No other common nicotine product delivers so many fast, discrete reinforcers in a day. Demo 3 makes the arithmetic of the schedule explicit, turning puffs per cigarette and cigarettes per day into the cumulative count of steeply reinforced trials.

Cues, wanting, and the ubiquity of the cigarette

A steeply reinforced, densely repeated behavior recruits the associative machinery of addiction with unusual force. The incentive-sensitization theory distinguishes two dissociable components of reward: liking, the hedonic pleasure a drug delivers, and wanting, the motivational pull toward it. Repeated use sensitizes the wanting system while liking stays flat or fades, so a smoker can be driven toward a cigarette that no longer delivers much pleasure (Robinson & Berridge, 1993; Berridge & Robinson, 2016).

For the cigarette this plays out across the whole of daily life. Because smoking is woven into so many routines—the coffee, the drive, the break, the drink—an unusually large set of ordinary cues acquires incentive salience and comes to trigger craving on its own (Rose, 2006). Real-time assessment of smokers in their own daily environments confirms that such cues provoke craving episodes outside any deliberate decision to smoke, and that these momentary urges predict lapse (Shiffman et al., 2008). Where the cigar's cues are few and ceremonial, the cigarette's are many and mundane, so the sensitized wanting is attached to a dense web of everyday triggers.

Dependence, withdrawal, and cognition

Cigarette smokers often report that the drug steadies attention or mood. Acute nicotine does produce small, genuine improvements in sustained attention and response speed in meta-analysis (Heishman et al., 2010). But in anyone who has become dependent—and the cigarette produces dependence readily—much of the felt benefit is the relief of withdrawal rather than enhancement above a non-user's baseline. As dependence forms, the reward and stress systems shift toward a state in which the drug is needed to feel normal, a move from positive reinforcement toward relief of a drug-created deficit (Koob & Volkow, 2016). Because the cigarette delivers nicotine fast and often, that trajectory is quicker and more certain than with slower products, but it is the same trajectory, driven by the same pharmacology (Benowitz, 2010).

Worked Example

The cigarette's two defining quantities—its steep delivery and the sheer frequency of the puff—can both be made numerical.

Delivery rate. Model brain nicotine after a dose as a one-compartment system filling toward a peak C_max with a delivery time constant τ:

C(t) = C_max (1 − e^−t/τ)

The quantity the rate hypothesis says the reward system reads is the initial rate of rise, the slope at the start, which is C_max / τ. Take the same peak for both routes, C_max = 25 ng/mL. Give the inhaled cigarette a pulmonary time constant τ = 0.3 min and a non-inhaled cigar a buccal τ = 6 min:

- Inhaled cigarette: 25 / 0.3 = 83.3 ng/mL per minute - Non-inhaled cigar: 25 / 6 = 4.2 ng/mL per minute

A twentyfold difference in the steepness of the leading edge from an identical peak dose—the pharmacological core of why inhaling is what makes the cigarette hook. The time to reach a fraction f of the peak is t = −τ ln(1 − f), so the inhaled cigarette reaches half its peak in 0.3 × 0.693 = 0.21 min (about 12 seconds), while the non-inhaled cigar reaches half in 6 × 0.693 = 4.16 min.

Reinforcement schedule. Each cigarette is smoked in about p = 10 puffs, and each puff is its own fast spike. For a smoker of c cigarettes a day, the number of discretely reinforced doses is N = p × c:

- One pack a day: 10 × 20 = 200 doses per day - Over a year: 200 × 365 = 73,000 doses - Over ten years: 730,000 discretely reinforced nicotine spikes

That is the overlearning behind the habit. The cigar smoker may take a handful of slow doses in a sitting; the pack-a-day cigarette smoker takes two hundred fast ones, each tightening the same cue–action–reward association, until the behavior runs with little deliberation.

Acidity. The fraction of nicotine that is un-ionised, and so available for oral absorption, follows the Henderson–Hasselbalch relation for a weak base of dissociation constant pK_a ≈ 8.0:

f_un-ionised = 1 / (1 + 10^{(pK_a − pH)})

- Acidic cigarette smoke, pH 6.0: 1 / (1 + 10^2.0) = 1 / 101 = about 1% un-ionised—almost nothing absorbed in the mouth, so the smoker must inhale. - Alkaline cigar smoke, pH 8.0: 1 / (1 + 10⁰) = 1 / 2 = 50% un-ionised.

From 1% to 50% is a fifty-fold change in the nicotine available for immediate oral uptake, produced by a two-unit shift in pH. The cigarette sits at the acidic end, where oral uptake is negligible—which is exactly why the cigarette smoker inhales, and so takes the fast route the rate hypothesis reads as the strongest reinforcer. Demo 1 varies τ and C_max; Demo 2 varies the pH; Demo 3 varies the schedule.

Discussion

Read cognitively, the cigarette is the limiting case of the rate hypothesis. It holds nicotine constant and delivers it about as fast as any ordinary product can, and in doing so it demonstrates the principle more forcefully than any laboratory manipulation: the same molecule, delivered swiftly through the lungs instead of slowly across the mouth, reinforces more and addicts more (Benowitz, 2010; Russell, 1990). The chemistry that makes this possible—the acidity that denies the mouth any nicotine and so forces inhalation—shows that the behavior (inhaling) and the pharmacology (a fast arterial spike) are two faces of a single physical fact (Benowitz et al., 2009).

But the cigarette's addictiveness is not only a matter of speed. Its second lever is frequency: hundreds of discretely reinforced puffs a day overlearn the behavior until it is automatic and cue-driven, which is part of why intention alone so rarely ends it (Rose, 2006; Shiffman et al., 2008). Speed sets the depth of each reinforcement; repetition sets how thoroughly the habit is written in. The cigar and the cigarette mark the two ends of the same spectrum, and the cigarette is instructive precisely because it shows what nicotine does when nothing slows it down.

Current Directions

Two active fronts bear directly on cigarette smoking. The first is the comparative pharmacology of newer nicotine products: vaping devices and heated-tobacco products deliver nicotine on time-courses that sit between the cigarette and the slower forms, and the cognitive question—how steeply does the brain level rise, and therefore how reinforcing is the product—now carries direct policy stakes, because a product that approaches the cigarette's delivery speed may approach its addictiveness (Benowitz, 2010; West, 2017). The second is a deepening neurocircuitry account of how the cigarette's fast, frequent delivery maps onto the reward and stress systems over time, tracing the shift from positive reinforcement toward relief of a drug-created deficit onto specific circuits (Koob & Volkow, 2016). Underlying both is a sharpening receptor-level picture of how nicotine acts on particular nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes to produce the learned changes that sustain any tobacco habit (Wittenberg et al., 2020).

Common Misconceptions

Cigarettes are addictive because they contain the most nicotine.

They do not—a large cigar can hold far more. Addictiveness tracks the rate of delivery, not the total dose. The cigarette hooks hardest because its acidic smoke forces inhalation, and inhalation delivers nicotine to the brain as a fast arterial spike, the steepest reinforcer the rate hypothesis identifies (Russell, 1990; Benowitz, 2010).

The nicotine is what makes cigarettes deadly.

Addictiveness and harm are dissociable. Nicotine drives the dependence, but the disease comes chiefly from the tars and other toxins in the smoke, delivered to the lungs by inhalation; people smoke for the nicotine but are harmed by the rest of the smoke (Russell, 1990; West, 2017). The harm follows where the smoke is drawn: smokers who use pipes or cigars exclusively, or who switch to them from cigarettes, shift their disease burden toward the mouth and throat and away from the lung (Henley et al., 2004; Wald & Watt, 1997).

A smoker who really wants to quit can simply decide to.

Intention is rarely enough, because the behavior is overlearned. Hundreds of fast, cue-paired reinforcements a day make smoking automatic and cue-triggered, so momentary urges arise outside any decision to smoke and routinely override the stated intention to stop (Rose, 2006; Shiffman et al., 2008).

A cigarette genuinely calms the nerves and sharpens the mind.

Acute nicotine gives small real gains in attention, but in a dependent smoker most of the felt benefit is relief of the deficits that abstinence itself produces—a repair of a drug-created deficit, not enhancement above baseline (Heishman et al., 2010; Koob & Volkow, 2016).

Glossary

Acidic smoke.

Smoke with a pH low enough that almost all of its nicotine is ionised and cannot be absorbed across the lining of the mouth; characteristic of flue-cured cigarette tobacco, which is why cigarette smokers must inhale.

Addiction.

A disorder of compulsive drug seeking and use maintained by learned changes in reward, attention, and motivation; in tobacco it is driven by nicotine and the cues paired with it.

Arterial bolus.

A concentrated slug of drug carried in the arterial blood; nicotine from inhaled cigarette smoke reaches the brain as an arterial bolus within about ten to twenty seconds of a puff, the fast arrival the rate hypothesis reads as strongly reinforcing.

Craving.

An intense, often cue-triggered desire to smoke; in incentive-sensitization theory it is the subjective face of sensitized wanting and, for the cigarette, is provoked by a dense web of everyday cues.

Delivery kinetics.

The time-course over which a drug reaches the brain after a dose; for nicotine, set chiefly by the route of absorption and captured here by the time constant τ.

Dependence.

The state in which a drug is needed to feel normal and its absence produces withdrawal; the cigarette produces it readily because of fast, frequent nicotine delivery.

Henderson–Hasselbalch relation.

The equation linking the ionisation of a weak acid or base to pH; applied to nicotine it gives the un-ionised fraction available for absorption as a function of smoke pH.

Incentive salience.

The motivational property—wanting—that a reward and its cues acquire through conditioning, making them attractive and able to command attention and action independently of pleasure.

Incentive-sensitization.

The theory that repeated drug use sensitizes the brain's wanting system, so cue-driven craving grows and persists while the pleasure (liking) stays flat or fades.

Nicotine.

The principal addictive compound in tobacco, an agonist at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that triggers mesolimbic dopamine release; the same molecule across tobacco products, differing only in how fast it is delivered.

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

The ligand-gated ion channel at which nicotine acts; its activation on midbrain dopamine neurons links the drug to the reward pathway and is the molecular starting point of the habit.

Overlearning.

The entrenching of a behavior through repetition far beyond the point of acquisition, making it automatic and cue-triggered; the cigarette's hundreds of daily puffs overlearn smoking until it runs with little deliberation.

Pulmonary absorption.

Uptake of a drug across the large surface of the lungs; for nicotine it is fast and feeds directly into the arterial circulation, and it is the route by which cigarette smokers take up the drug.

Rate hypothesis.

The proposal that the reinforcing power of a drug dose scales with how quickly it reaches the brain, not just with the peak concentration; it explains why a fast pulmonary spike addicts more than a slow buccal rise.

Reinforcement.

The strengthening of a behavior by its consequences; cigarette smoking is strongly reinforced because each puff is a fast nicotine spike, and it is heavily reinforced because the puffs are so many.

Un-ionised fraction.

The proportion of nicotine in the electrically neutral form that crosses membranes freely; it rises with smoke pH and, being tiny in acidic cigarette smoke, is why the cigarette must be inhaled.

Wanting.

The motivational pull toward a reward, dissociable from the pleasure it gives; sensitized by repeated drug use and attached to cues, it is the craving that drives smoking and relapse.

Key Researchers

Neal L. Benowitz

(Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco). The foremost authority on the clinical pharmacology of nicotine, whose work on absorption, metabolism, and the arterial kinetics of inhaled smoke underpins the rate-based account of why route determines addictiveness. Faculty · Google Scholar · Wikipedia

John A. Dani

(Department of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania). A leader in the neuroscience of nicotine, whose work connects the action of nicotine at its receptors to the dopaminergic reward signalling that sustains tobacco use. Faculty

Stephen J. Heishman

(National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH Intramural Research Program). A behavioral pharmacologist whose meta-analytic work established the modest, real—and largely withdrawal-relieving—acute cognitive effects of nicotine and smoking. Faculty

Michael A. H. Russell

(1932–2009) (Addiction Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, London). A pioneer of nicotine science who argued that people smoke for nicotine but die from the tar, and whose work on delivery and dependence laid the groundwork for the rate hypothesis the cigarette illustrates at its extreme. Wikipedia

Saul Shiffman

(Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh). A founder of ecological momentary assessment, who brought the real-time measurement of craving, cue exposure, and lapse into the smoker's own daily environment. Faculty · Google Scholar

Robert West

(Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London). A leading figure in the science of tobacco use and cessation, and a longtime editor of the field, whose syntheses frame the health impact, prevalence, and treatment of smoking. Faculty · Google Scholar · Wikipedia

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are cigarettes more addictive than cigars or pipes?

Because the nicotine arrives faster. Cigarette smoke is acidic, so almost none of its nicotine can be absorbed in the mouth; the smoker must inhale, and the lungs deliver the drug to the brain as a fast arterial spike within seconds. The rate hypothesis holds that a steep rise reinforces the behavior more strongly than a slow one, so the inhaled cigarette hooks harder than a non-inhaled cigar even though it carries less nicotine.

Does a cigarette contain more nicotine than a cigar?

Usually far less. A single large cigar can hold as much nicotine as a whole pack of cigarettes. What makes the cigarette more addictive is not the dose but the delivery: inhalation produces the steep arterial spike that drives the strongest reinforcement, while the cigar's slow buccal uptake never does.

Why do cigarette smokers have to inhale?

Because the smoke is acidic. Nicotine crosses membranes only in its un-ionised form, and in acidic smoke almost all of it is ionised, so essentially none can be absorbed across the mouth. The only way to take up a useful dose is to draw the smoke into the lungs, whose vast surface absorbs the drug rapidly.

Is it the nicotine in cigarettes that causes cancer and heart disease?

Largely no. Nicotine drives the addiction, but most of the disease comes from the tars and other toxins in the smoke, delivered to the lungs by inhalation. The classic formulation is that people smoke for the nicotine but are harmed by the rest of the smoke, so how addictive the cigarette is and how deadly it is are set by different things.

Why is it so hard to quit smoking by willpower alone?

Because the behavior is overlearned. A pack-a-day smoker takes around two hundred fast, cue-paired nicotine doses a day, tens of thousands a year, until smoking becomes automatic and triggered by everyday cues. Those momentary urges arise outside any decision to smoke and routinely override the stated intention to stop.

Do cues and routines really drive smoking?

Yes, and for the cigarette they are everywhere. Because smoking is woven into so many daily routines, a large set of ordinary cues acquires a pull of its own under incentive-sensitization and triggers craving when it recurs. Real-time studies of smokers show these cue-driven urges predict lapse.

Does a cigarette really help someone relax or concentrate?

Only marginally, and mostly as relief rather than true enhancement. Acute nicotine produces small genuine gains in attention, but in a dependent smoker much of the felt calm is the reversal of the restlessness and poor concentration that abstinence itself causes. The experience is real, but it is largely the quieting of a deficit the nicotine helps maintain.

How is cigarette smoking related to tobacco smoking in general?

Cigarette smoking is one form of tobacco smoking, distinguished by how the tobacco is burned and taken up rather than by a different drug. It sits at the fast-delivery end of the same spectrum that runs through pipes and cigars, which is what makes it such a clear illustration of the general principle that delivery rate, not the product category, governs how addictive a form of smoking is.

References

Benowitz, N. L., Hukkanen, J., & Jacob, P. (2009). Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers. In J. E. Henningfield, E. D. London, & S. Pogun (Eds.), Nicotine psychopharmacology (Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 192, pp. 29–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69248-5_2

Benowitz, N. L. (2010). Nicotine addiction. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(24), 2295–2303. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0809890

Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2016). Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. American Psychologist, 71(8), 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000059

Dani, J. A., & Balfour, D. J. K. (2011). Historical and current perspective on tobacco use and nicotine addiction. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(7), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2011.05.001

Heishman, S. J., Kleykamp, B. A., & Singleton, E. G. (2010). Meta-analysis of the acute effects of nicotine and smoking on human performance. Psychopharmacology, 210(4), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-1848-1

Henley, S. J., Thun, M. J., Chao, A., & Calle, E. E. (2004). Association between exclusive pipe smoking and mortality from cancer and other diseases. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96(11), 853–861. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh144

Koob, G. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2016). Neurobiology of addiction: A neurocircuitry analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00104-8

Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18(3), 247–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P

Rose, J. E. (2006). Nicotine and nonnicotine factors in cigarette addiction. Psychopharmacology, 184(3–4), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0250-x

Russell, M. A. H. (1990). The nicotine addiction trap: A 40-year sentence for four cigarettes. British Journal of Addiction, 85(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb03085.x

Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415

Wald, N. J., & Watt, H. C. (1997). Prospective study of effect of switching from cigarettes to pipes or cigars on mortality from three smoking related diseases. BMJ, 314(7098), 1860–1863. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1860

West, R. (2017). Tobacco smoking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychology & Health, 32(8), 1018–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1325890

Wittenberg, R. E., Wolfman, S. L., De Biasi, M., & Dani, J. A. (2020). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and nicotine addiction: A brief introduction. Neuropharmacology, 177, 108256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108256